September 2026 Newsletter

NewsGuard & Censorship Update
 
September 2026 Report
Inside This Edition:
  • South Carolina Joins Growing Pushback Against Media Blacklists
  • FTC Examining AI Accuracy and Undisclosed Ideological Objectives
  • FCC Scraps 39% Broadcast Ownership Cap, Setting Up Legal Fight
  • X and World Federation of Advertisers Settle GARM Lawsuit
  • NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup
OVERVIEW
Momentum continues to build in the fight against media censorship, with states increasingly taking action to prevent taxpayer dollars from supporting politically biased media blacklists. South Carolina has become the latest state to enact protections against censorship-by-proxy, joining Florida and West Virginia in pushing back against practices that unfairly disadvantage conservative and independent media.
We expect that momentum to continue in the fall when Congress is back in session. Lawmakers are increasingly recognizing the challenges posed by media blacklists, advertiser coordination and other forms of censorship, creating new opportunities to advance protections for free speech and a free press.
Also in this edition, we look at the FTC’s growing scrutiny of ideological bias in AI, the FCC’s decision to eliminate the 39 percent broadcast ownership cap and the legal questions surrounding that move, and the settlement between X and the World Federation of Advertisers in the GARM lawsuit.
IMC will continue working with policymakers and industry leaders at both the state and federal levels to protect a free and competitive media marketplace. Visit us at IMCAmerica.com to learn about membership and more.
GOVERNMENT
South Carolina Joins Growing Pushback Against Media Blacklists
South Carolina has become the latest state to take a stand against media censorship and politically biased media blacklists.
Gov. Henry McMaster signed the state’s 2026–27 budget into law last month, including a provision that prohibits taxpayer-funded advertising from being filtered through media-monitoring systems. As a result, state agencies cannot contract with firms that use media monitors such as NewsGuard, Ad Fontes Media and the Global Disinformation Index (GDI) when placing state-funded advertising.
“South Carolina lawmakers deserve credit for recognizing the growing threat media blacklists pose to free speech and a free press,” said IMC spokesperson Christine Czernejewski. “Taxpayer-funded advertising should not be filtered through ideological gatekeepers masquerading as neutral watchdogs. South Carolina’s action sends a clear message that government should not subsidize private censorship schemes. We applaud Gov. McMaster for signing this provision into law.”
South Carolina joins a growing national movement against media blacklists and censorship-by-proxy. Florida renewed similar protections through its state budget for a second consecutive year, while West Virginia enacted comparable safeguards through its First Amendment Preservation Act earlier this year.
Congress has also adopted related language in the National Defense Authorization Act restricting the Pentagon from using advertising agencies that employ misinformation-monitoring systems when placing military recruitment ads. And the Federal Trade Commission has been addressing concerns that coordinated “brand safety” and exclusion-list practices may be used to discriminate against media outlets based on their political or ideological content.
The IMC will continue working to ensure taxpayer resources are not used to support censorship of independent and conservative media and to protect free speech and a free press.
See IMC’s press release here.
FTC Examining AI Accuracy and Undisclosed Ideological Objectives
The Federal Trade Commission recently sought public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing whether AI companies could violate federal consumer-protection law by altering AI outputs to advance undisclosed ideological or other objectives.
The proposal argues that consumers may be misled when AI systems are marketed as producing truthful or accurate results but are intentionally steered toward other undisclosed objectives. It also states that AI companies could face potential liability under Section 5 of the FTC Act if their representations or omissions about how their systems operate materially mislead consumers.
The proposed statement also addresses state AI laws. The FTC contends that state requirements that compel companies to alter otherwise accurate AI outputs could conflict with companies’ obligations under federal consumer-protection law. This remains the FTC’s proposed position rather than a binding rule or final enforcement policy.
President Trump’s December 11, 2025, executive order directed the FTC to issue a policy statement addressing the application of the FTC Act to AI and how state laws requiring alterations to accurate AI outputs may conflict with federal policy.
The proposal was published in the Federal Register on July 7, and the public-comment period closed July 31. As of September 8, the FTC has not announced a final policy statement or additional formal action on the proposal.
Read the FTC proposal and Federal Register notice.
FCC Replaces 39% Broadcast Ownership Cap, Setting Up Legal Fight
The Federal Communications Commission has voted to repeal the longstanding national television ownership cap and replace it with case-by-case review of proposed transactions, setting up a likely legal battle over media consolidation and the FCC’s authority.
In a 2–1 vote on August 6, the FCC eliminated the rule generally preventing a single broadcaster from owning television stations reaching more than 39 percent of U.S. television households. Under the new system, the FCC may approve transactions exceeding that threshold if it determines they serve the public interest.
Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who helped negotiate the 39 percent threshold more than two decades ago, argues that the FCC lacks the authority to eliminate it.
In a recent Daily Wire piece, I Helped Create the FCC’s Ownership Cap. Here’s How We Did It, DeLay explained that the threshold resulted from a compromise negotiated by Congress in 2003 and signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2004.
DeLay, a longtime advocate for deregulation, said the question is not whether the cap should change, but who has the authority to change it.
“If Chairman Carr wants to raise the statutory cap, he should ask Congress to pass a law giving him authority to do that,” DeLay wrote.
The public-interest organization Free Press has announced that it and its allies intend to challenge the FCC’s decision. As of September 8, no court challenge appears to have been publicly filed.
The anticipated litigation could determine whether the FCC had authority to replace the congressionally established threshold without further legislative action. The outcome carries significant implications for broadcast ownership, competition, local journalism and consolidation in the American media industry.
LEGAL
X and World Federation of Advertisers Settle GARM Lawsuit
Elon Musk’s X and the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) have settled their long-running legal dispute, bringing an end to one of the most closely watched legal battles over advertiser coordination and online speech.
X filed suit in 2024, alleging that the WFA and several major advertisers coordinated an unlawful boycott that deprived the platform of billions of dollars in advertising revenue after Elon Musk acquired Twitter. Although a federal judge dismissed X’s antitrust claims earlier this year, X appealed the decision before ultimately reaching a settlement with the WFA. Individual claims against several advertisers remain separate.
As part of the agreement, the WFA reaffirmed its commitment to freedom of speech, confirmed that the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) —which was dissolved shortly after X filed suit in 2024—will not be revived, and stated that both organizations support continued innovation in brand safety practices.
While the litigation has ended, the broader questions surrounding advertiser influence, platform moderation policies, and viewpoint diversity remain unresolved and are likely to continue shaping debates over digital speech and competition.
MEDIA ROUNDUP
3rd State Strikes Latest Blow Against Media Blacklists
The Daily Signal by Rob Bluey, 8/19/26
https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/08/19/south-carolina-media-blacklists/
South Carolina Becomes Latest State to Push Back on Media Censorship
JBizNews, 8/18/26
https://jbiznews.com/south-carolina-becomes-latest-state-to-push-back-on-media-censorship/
SC Bans Funds for Ad Agencies Using NewsGuard, Censorship Programs
Newsmax Wires, 8/18/26
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/south-carolina-newsguard-censorship/2026/08/17/id/1266399/
Free Press Plans to Take Carr to Court in Response to Thursday’s Unlawful Decision to Eliminate a Vital Limit on Media Consolidation
Free Press, 8/06/26
https://www.freepress.net/news/free-press-plans-take-carr-court-over-repeal-ownership-cap
Opinion: Montana Should Stop Funding Media Blacklists
The Missoulian by State Rep. Amy Regier, 8/04/26
https://billingsgazette.com/opinion/column/article_0fcc17c6-cfb2-54b2-a39a-d273e965a82e.html
Tom DeLay: I Helped Create the FCC’s Ownership Cap. Here’s How We Did It.
The Daily Wire, 8/03/26
https://www.dailywire.com/news/tom-delay-i-helped-create-the-fccs-ownership-cap-heres-how-we-did-it?topStoryPosition=undefined&author=Tom+DeLay&category=News+and+Commentary&elementPosition=1&row=1&rowHeadline=Top+Stories&rowType=Top+Stories&title=Tom+DeLay%3A+I+Helped+Create+The+FCC%E2%80%99s+Ownership+Cap.+Here%E2%80%99s+How+We+Did+It
Elon Musk’s X and WFA End Multiyear Legal Spat
AdWeek by Kendra Barnett, 7/29/26
https://www.adweek.com/media/elon-musks-x-and-wfa-end-multiyear-legal-spat/

July 2026 Newsletter

NewsGuard & Censorship Update

 July 2026 Report

Inside This Edition:

  • Florida Doubles Down Against Media Blacklists
  • NewsGuard Takes Media Blacklisting into the AI Era
  • Bipartisan Senate Bill Targets Government-Driven Censorship
  • NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup

OVERVIEW

Momentum continues to build in the fight against media blacklisting.

This month’s newsletter highlights several major victories, including Florida’s decision to renew its anti-media blacklist protections for a second consecutive year and bipartisan legislation in Congress aimed at preventing government officials from coercing private companies into censoring lawful speech.

At the same time, new challenges are emerging. NewsGuard has entered the AI space with a chatbot and is licensing its ratings to AI companies. This raises new concerns that media blacklisting is evolving beyond advertising into the information Americans receive through artificial intelligence.

As policymakers increasingly recognize the dangers of government-backed censorship and viewpoint discrimination, IMC remains committed to ensuring that independent and conservative media have a voice in these critical debates. Thank you for your continued partnership as we work together to protect free speech and a free press.

GOVERNMENT

Florida Doubles Down Against Media Blacklists

Florida has once again reaffirmed its leadership in the fight against media blacklisting.

Gov. Ron DeSantis has signed the state’s 2026-27 budget, preserving a provision that prohibits state agencies from contracting with advertising firms that use politically biased media monitors such as NewsGuard, Ad Fontes Media, and the Global Disinformation Index (GDI). This marks the second consecutive year the provision has been included in the state budget.

“Gov. DeSantis has once again demonstrated Florida’s leadership in defending free speech and viewpoint diversity,” said IMC spokesperson Christine Czernejewski. “By signing this provision for a second year, Florida is sending a clear message that taxpayer-funded advertising should be focused on reaching the broadest possible audience, not filtered through politically motivated media blacklist systems.”

Florida initially adopted the provision in 2025, becoming one of the first states in the nation to address the growing influence of biased media-monitoring organizations on advertising markets. By extending the policy for a second consecutive year, Florida is demonstrating that protecting taxpayer dollars from politically motivated media blacklists is an ongoing priority.

The state’s action comes as momentum continues to build nationwide. West Virginia recently enacted the First Amendment Preservation Act, Congress included anti-censorship protections in the FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act, and the Federal Trade Commission has increased scrutiny of viewpoint discrimination within the advertising industry.

Florida’s leadership provides another model for policymakers seeking to ensure taxpayer-funded advertising is guided by effectiveness, not ideological ratings.

See the IMC’s press release here.

NewsGuard Takes Media Blacklisting Into the AI Era

NewsGuard has announced the launch of NewsGuard AI, a chatbot that promises to answer users’ questions using only news sources NewsGuard has deemed “reliable.”

Given NewsGuard’s long record of assigning poor ratings to conservative outlets, IMC members should be alarmed, especially based on an early analysis of the chatbot.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, NewsGuard AI relied heavily on left-leaning sources when answering politically sensitive questions, omitted many conservative perspectives, and even suggested there may be as many as 72—or an “infinite” number of—genders.

Further, NewsGuard is licensing its data to AI companies to train their chatbots against “misinformation.” In other words, NewsGuard is training AI to only use its preferred sources and steer it away from those that are not aligned with progressive ideology.

Media Research Center – an IMC member – recently conducted an analysis of how major AI platforms assess news outlets. They found that every AI they tested – except Grok – treated notoriously leftist outlet The Guardian as reliable. Yet the other AI chatbots almost universally condemned right-of-center sources.

This represents a new frontier in media blacklisting. Instead of simply influencing advertisers or government agencies, NewsGuard is now positioning itself to influence what AI tells millions of users is a “credible” news source.

As AI rapidly becomes a primary gateway to news and information, the stakes are only getting higher. The IMC will continue to provide updates on this evolving issue. In the meantime, we encourage IMC members to cover this development.

See NewsGuard’s announcement here.

Bipartisan Senate Bill Targets Government-Driven Censorship

A bipartisan group of senators led by US Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) has introduced S. 4749, the Justice Against Weaponized Bureaucratic Overreach to Networked Expression (JAWBONE) Act. The legislation is designed to prevent government agencies and officials from pressuring private companies to suppress lawful speech.

The proposal is particularly significant for Independent Media Council members, many of whom have experienced the effects of government-backed censorship efforts firsthand.

The JAWBONE Act would create new legal remedies for individuals and organizations harmed by such conduct and would increase transparency around government communications with social media platforms, advertisers, AI companies, and other intermediaries. The legislation follows a series of legal battles and congressional investigations examining whether federal agencies have improperly encouraged private actors to restrict speech that the government could not constitutionally suppress itself.

The IMC has sent a letter of support for the JAWBONE Act to Senators Cruz and Wyden, stating that there is “a growing consensus that government should not facilitate or incentivize censorship.”

Yet despite this progress, significant gaps remain.

“Government officials can still exert pressure behind the scenes, using informal communications, funding relationships, regulatory leverage, or public threats to induce private actors to suppress speech that government could not constitutionally prohibit on its own,” IMC’s letter stated.

The JAWBONE Act represents a potentially important step toward ensuring that government agencies cannot use third parties to silence disfavored viewpoints or manipulate the flow of information in the public square.

Read bill text of the legislation here.

Read the IMC’s letter in support of the legislation here.

MEDIA ROUNDUP

Florida Just Showed Us How to Fight Back Against Media Blacklists

The Daily Signal by Rob Bluey, 7/07/26 (Also appeared in RealClearPolitics)

https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/07/07/florida-media-blacklists-newsguard/

 

DeSantis Signs Anti-Censorship Law for Second Straight Year

Newsmax by Newsmax Wires, 7/02/26 (Also appeared in RealClearPolitics)

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/ron-desantis-blacklisting-censorship/2026/07/02/id/1261581/

 

Victory: SCOTUS Ruling Protects Trump’s Power to Fire Gov Censors

MRC by Gabriel Pariseau, 7/2/26

https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/gabriela-pariseau-amanda-evans/2026/07/02/victory-scotus-ruling-protects-trumps

 

Gemini Staunchly Defends Foreign Leftist Outlet, Goes After Right Media

MRC by Tom Olohan, 6/29/26

https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/tom-olohan/2026/06/29/gemini-staunchly-defends-foreign-leftist-outlet-goes-after

 

Nebraska Joins FTC and Coalition of States in Promoting Competition in the Digital Advertising Ecosystem

Office of Mike Hilgers, Nebraska Attorney General, 6/30/26

https://ago.nebraska.gov/nebraska-joins-ftc-and-coalition-states-promoting-competition-digital-advertising-ecosystem

 

A Media Watchdog Released an AI ‘Fact-Checker.’ It Says There May be 72 Genders

Washington Free Beacon by Aaron Sibarium, 6/26/26

https://freebeacon.com/media/a-media-watchdog-released-an-ai-fact-checker-it-says-there-may-be-72-genders/

 

I Co-Founded Wikipedia. Now I’m Banned for Life

The Free Press by Larry Sanger, 6/26/26

https://www.thefp.com/p/larry-sanger-wikipedia-co-founder-banned

 

Back GOP AGs Kobach, Rokita, Sunday and Oppose Nexstar Merger

Newsmax by Dick Morris, 6/19/26

https://www.newsmax.com/morris/merger-nexstar-tegna/2026/06/19/id/1260246/

 

A Media Watchdog is Helping to Train AI Models. It Says Chinese Propaganda is more Reliable than Many American News Sources

Washington Free Beacon by Aaron Sibarium, 6/18/26

https://freebeacon.com/media/a-media-watchdog-is-helping-to-train-ai-models-it-says-chinese-propaganda-is-more-reliable-than-many-american-news-sources/

 

Two Senators Offer a Bipartisan Solution to Censorship by Proxy

Reason by Jacob Sullum, 6/11/26

https://reason.com/2026/06/11/two-senators-offer-a-bipartisan-solution-to-censorship-by-proxy/

June 2026 Newsletter

NewsGuard & Censorship Update
 
June 2026 Report

Inside This Edition:

  • Fla. Makes Law Anti-Blacklist
  • NewsGuard Appeals FTC

  • Apple Hits Conservatives

  • NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup

OVERVIEW
This month’s newsletter highlights continued momentum in the fight against viewpoint discrimination and censorship-by-proxy in advertising and media.
Florida has strengthened its position as a national leader by including anti-media-blacklist protections in its 2026–27 budget for the second consecutive year. On the legal front, NewsGuard is pressing a fast-track appeal against the FTC as its dispute over alleged unconstitutional retaliation moves through the courts. We also spotlight new research from IMC member Media Research Center, whose latest analysis finds that major news aggregators continue to heavily favor left-leaning outlets while sidelining conservative publications with combined audiences in the hundreds of millions.
These developments underscore the urgency of IMC’s mission and the growing national conversation around fairness, transparency, and free expression in the digital media landscape. Read on for more and visit IMCAmerica.com for further resources and membership information.
GOVERNMENT
Florida Makes Law Anti-Blacklist, Setting National Example
Florida lawmakers have once again reaffirmed the state’s commitment to free speech and viewpoint diversity by including anti-media-blacklist protections in the 2026-27 state budget. The provision prohibits state agencies from contracting with advertising and marketing firms that rely on politically biased media-monitoring and “brand safety” systems such as NewsGuard, Ad Fontes, and the Global Disinformation Index (GDI). The budget now heads to Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is expected to sign it into law.
The measure marks the second consecutive year Florida has included the provision in its budget, reinforcing the state’s position as a national leader in the fight against censorship disguised as advertising oversight. Florida was among the first states to directly challenge media blacklist operations.
“Florida lawmakers deserve credit for continuing to stand up against politically driven media blacklist systems that distort advertising markets and suppress viewpoints,” said IMC spokesperson Christine Czernejewski. “Taxpayer-funded advertising should maximize public reach, not be filtered through ideological gatekeepers masquerading as neutral watchdogs.”
The move comes amid growing national momentum against censorship-by-proxy. In recent months, West Virginia enacted similar protections through its First Amendment Preservation Act, Congress included anti-censorship language in the National Defense Authorization Act, and federal regulators have scrutinized coordinated “brand safety” practices among major advertising firms.
As concerns about viewpoint discrimination in advertising continue to grow, IMC expects additional states to follow Florida’s lead.
NewsGuard Seeks Fast-Track Appeal in Fight with FTC
NewsGuard is asking a federal appeals court to fast-track its challenge against the Federal Trade Commission after a lower court declined to issue a preliminary injunction in the company’s ongoing dispute with the agency, according to Law 360. The appeal centers on NewsGuard’s claim that the FTC has engaged in unconstitutional retaliation against the company through investigations and merger-related restrictions affecting its business.
The dispute stems from an FTC investigation launched in 2025 and consent agreements tied to major advertising industry mergers. NewsGuard argues the agency has sought to punish the company because of its media-rating services, while the FTC maintains its actions are related to broader concerns about advertising market practices and potential coordination among media-monitoring organizations.
Although the FTC has since withdrawn its original document demand, NewsGuard argues that subsequent FTC actions—including restrictions affecting the use of third-party media-rating services by major advertising firms—continue to harm its business and warrant judicial review. A district court recently ruled that NewsGuard had not yet demonstrated irreparable harm sufficient to justify a preliminary injunction.
RESEARCH
Once Again, Report Finds Apple, Major News Apps Hit Conservative Media
Media Research Center (MRC) – an IMC member – released a new analysis that raises fresh concerns about the growing influence of digital news gatekeepers. The report found that Apple News, Google News, Microsoft’s MSN, and Yahoo News overwhelmingly promoted left-leaning media outlets while largely excluding right-leaning publications from their most prominent news feeds. According to the study, 92% of left-leaning outlets appearing on Press Gazette’s list of the nation’s 50 most-visited news sites received promotion from the major news aggregators, compared to just 16.7% of right-leaning outlets.
The disparity is particularly notable because several of the excluded conservative outlets—including the New York Post, Daily Mail, Breitbart, The Gateway Pundit, and Newsmax—collectively attracted more than 414 million visits during the month analyzed. Despite their sizable audiences, the report found that these outlets received little to no comparable visibility from the dominant news aggregation platforms, which serve as a primary gateway to information for millions of Americans.
The findings build on a growing body of research examining ideological imbalances in curated news feeds. Earlier MRC research found that the “Big Four” news apps promoted left-leaning outlets approximately 70% of the time while featuring right-leaning outlets just 5% of the time. Apple News was identified as the most imbalanced platform, promoting fewer than 0.5% of stories from right-leaning outlets during a five-month period, while Yahoo News promoted left-leaning sources nearly 87% of the time.
MEDIA ROUNDUP

Florida Lawmakers Move to Block State Use of Media Ratings Firms

Daily Signal by Karly Tucker, 6/4/26

https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/06/04/florida-to-block-media-blacklists/

(Also picked up by RealClearPolitics)

Special Report: 92 to 16: Big Four News Apps Give Leftist Outlets Massive Advantage, Suppress Right
MRC by Luis Cornelio, 6/4/26
https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/luis-cornelio/2026/06/04/special-report-92-16-big-four-news-apps-give-leftist
Conservative nonprofit praises Florida legislature for standing against ‘media blacklists’
Just the News by Misti Severi, 6/2/26
https://justthenews.com/accountability/media/conservative-nonprofit-praises-florida-legislature-standing-against-media

NewsGuard Wants Appeal Over FTC ‘Retaliation’ Fast Tracked

Law 360 by Matthew Perlman, 5/29/26

https://www.law360.com/articles/2483463/newsguard-wants-appeal-over-ftc-retaliation-fast-tracked

 
The Business Side of Censorship, Part 1

Mike Benz, 5/24/26

https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/2058513557478572056
The Business Side of Censorship, Part 2
Mike Benz, 5/24/26
https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/2059388173583610152

May 2026 Newsletter

NewsGuard & Censorship Update

May 2026 Report

Inside This Edition:

  • NewsGuard’s Ties to Southern Poverty Law Center Draw Scrutiny
  • Ad Giants Drop “Brand Safety” Standards, FTC Alleges Collusion
  • New Report Shows Wikipedia Editors Buried SPLC Indictment Amid Bias Concerns
  • Nexstar-TEGNA Merger Faces Backlash from Free Speech Advocates
  • NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup

OVERVIEW

This month brought major developments in the fight against viewpoint discrimination, and the use of “misinformation” and “brand safety” tools to shape public discourse.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reached settlements with major advertising firms over coordinated “brand safety” standards allegedly used to stop “misinformation.” The FTC alleged firms like NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index (GDI) used this misinformation designation as a means to promote the demonetization of certain political viewpoints.  

NewsGuard is also under scrutiny for its ties to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SLPC), which is under federal indictment. Meanwhile, a Media Research Center report found Wikipedia editors minimized coverage of the SPLC indictment, underscoring growing criticism over the site’s bias against conservative media outlets.

Finally, the proposed Nexstar-TEGNA merger continues to face significant backlash from free speech advocates who warn it would further concentrate control over local television news and reduce viewpoint diversity nationwide.

Read on for more and visit IMCAmerica.com for further resources and membership information.

GOVERNMENT

NewsGuard’s Ties to Southern Poverty Law Center Draw Scrutiny

NewsGuard has faced renewed scrutiny over reported ties to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), after investigative reporter Paul Sperry highlighted claims that NewsGuard has relied on SPLC materials and designations in evaluating media outlets and organizations. Critics argue the relationship raises concerns about ideological bias because the SPLC has long been accused of labeling mainstream conservative and religious groups as “extremist.”

The issue comes as the SPLC itself faces significant legal and regulatory scrutiny. In April, the U.S. Department of Justice announced an 11-count federal indictment alleging wire fraud, money laundering conspiracy, and false statements tied to the SPLC’s use of paid informants embedded within extremist groups. Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall has also launched a separate civil investigation into the organization..

Critics say the developments raise broader questions about whether media-rating and “misinformation” firms such as NewsGuard should rely on organizations facing active investigations and longstanding accusations of ideological targeting when assessing the credibility of news outlets.

Ad Giants Drop “Brand Safety” Standards, FTC Alleges Collusion

The FTC has reached a proposed settlement with major advertising holding companies—including Dentsu, Publicis Groupe, and WPP—requiring them to discontinue coordinated “brand safety” standards that regulators say distorted the advertising marketplace and suppressed certain viewpoints.

According to the complaint, the agencies allegedly colluded to impose uniform brand-safety rules that steered advertising dollars away from platforms deemed to contain “misinformation,” effectively creating exclusion lists that disadvantaged certain publishers. Notably, the FTC cites the firms’ reliance on data from entities such as NewsGuard and GDI to “promote the demonetization of disfavored political viewpoints.” The FTC further argues that this coordination undermined competition in the ad-buying marketplace.

“The ad agencies’ brand-safety conspiracy turned competition in the market for ad-buying services on its head,” FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson said in a statement, adding, “The antitrust laws guarantee participation in a market free from conduct, such as economic boycotts, that distort the fundamental competitive pressures that promote lower prices, higher quality products and increased innovation.”

Subsequently, the FTC has withdrawn its demand for information from NewsGuard, citing the recent settlements. In light of those agreements, the FTC indicated the information request is no longer necessary and that NewsGuard’s legal challenge to the demand is now effectively moot.

New Report Shows Wikipedia Editors Buried SPLC Indictment Amid Bias Concerns

A new report from the Media Research Center (MRC) found that Wikipedia editors downplayed and buried information related to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) recent federal indictment. According to the report, editors pushed references to the SPLC indictment deep into the organization’s Wikipedia page while allegedly giving far more prominent placement to investigations involving conservative individuals and organizations.

The report points to the SPLC’s April federal indictment on 11 counts tied to alleged wire fraud, false statements, and money laundering conspiracy stemming from the organization’s use of paid informants within extremist groups. MRC researchers found that Wikipedia editors removed or minimized references to the case across multiple pages, including content related to the Unite the Right rally.

The controversy highlights broader concerns about ideological bias on Wikipedia, particularly given the platform’s outsized influence on Google search results and AI-generated summaries.

Nexstar-TEGNA Merger Faces Backlash from Free Speech Advocates

The proposed merger between Nexstar Media Group and TEGNA continues to face mounting legal and political scrutiny despite receiving approval from the Federal Communications Commission in March.

The FCC approved the $6.2 billion deal by granting Nexstar waivers to exceed longstanding national and local television ownership caps, arguing broadcasters need greater scale to compete with streaming platforms and national media giants. However, the merger would create unprecedented concentration in local television news, with the combined company potentially reaching roughly 80% of U.S. television households.

Opposition has come from a broad coalition that includes DirecTV, labor groups, state attorneys general, and conservative organizations concerned about media consolidation and rising retransmission fees. Critics argue the merger would reduce viewpoint diversity, increase consumer cable bills, and give Nexstar outsized leverage in both local news and carriage negotiations.

The merger also remains tied up in court. Multiple antitrust lawsuits were filed shortly after FCC approval, including actions from several states and DirecTV. A federal judge subsequently issued orders temporarily halting further integration of the two companies while litigation proceeds, citing concerns the merger is “likely to violate antitrust laws.”

MEDIA

Nexstar Posts Record Results, on Target for $2 Billion in Profts

By Newsmax Wires, 5/11/26

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/nexstar-tegna-merger/2026/05/11/id/1255900/

 

WIKI-BIAS EXPOSED: Wikipedia Editors Scramble to Bury SPLC Indictment

MRC by Tom Olohan, 5/7/26

https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/tom-olohan/2026/05/07/wiki-bias-exposed-wikipedia-editors-scramble-bury-splc

 

FTC Withdraws Demand for Information from NewsGuard

MediaPost by Wendy Davis, 4/17/26

https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/414415/ftc-withdraws-demand-for-information-from-newsguar.html

Special Report: 83% Left v. 15% Right – Yahoo News Most Bipolar Big Four News App in March

MRC by Heather Moon, Michael Morris, 4/16/26

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/free-speech/heather-moon/2026/04/16/special-report-83-left-vs-15-right-yahoo-news-was-most

FTC: Dentsu, Publicis, WPP to Discontinue ‘Brand Safety’ Standards

MediaPost by Wendy Davis, Joe Mandese, 4/15/26

https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/414325/ftc-dentsu-publicis-wpp-to-discontinue-brand-s.html

State Dept Settles with Conservative Media Outlets that Sued for Censorship During Biden Admin: ‘Never Again’

NY Post by Josh Christenson, 4/10/26

https://nypost.com/2026/04/10/us-news/state-dept-settles-with-conservative-media-outlets-that-sued-for-censorship-of-covid-election-posts/

April 2026 Newsletter

NewsGuard & Censorship Update

 April 2026 Report

Inside This Edition:

  • New West Virginia Law Strikes Censorship Groups Targeting Conservatives
  • Legal Victory Restricts State Dept’s Use of Media Monitors; Exposes Govt Censorship of Conservative Media
  • Judge Signals Skepticism in NewsGuard Case Against FTC Probe
  • Landmark Settlement Delivers Blow to Government-Backed Social Media Censorship
  • Federal Judge Halts Nexstar Merger as Legal Challenges, Criticism Mounts
  • News Advertising Isn’t the Risk Advertisers Think It Is
  • NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup

OVERVIEW

April marked a decisive turning point in the fight against media blacklists, as independent and conservative outlets scored a series of major victories against the entrenched censorship apparatus propped up by government actors and ideological ratings firms.

West Virginia dealt a direct blow to this system by enacting the First Amendment Preservation Act (SB 531), cutting off the use of taxpayer dollars to fund advertising schemes filtered through groups like NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index.

At the federal level, a sweeping legal settlement with the U.S. Department of State exposed and dismantled a key pillar of the censorship regime. The agreement prevents the State Department from supporting the censorship of American media outlets and restricts its use of media monitors.

In another significant development, a federal judge signaled clear skepticism toward NewsGuard’s attempt to shut down an FTC investigation, allowing scrutiny of its practices to move forward. Additional legal victories are placing new constraints on the federal government’s ability to collude with Big Tech to silence dissenting voices.

With momentum building and more states and regulators poised to act, the pushback against NewsGuard-style blacklists is accelerating into a full-scale rollback of the censorship industrial complex.

The IMC continues to monitor and support these efforts. Thanks to our members for staying in the fight. Please consider renewing your membership or joining today at IMCAmerica.com!

GOVERNMENT

New West Virginia Law Strikes Censorship Groups Targeting Conservatives

Independent and conservative media scored a big free speech victory when West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey signed the First Amendment Preservation Act (SB 531) into law early this month. The measure, supported by the IMC, ensures that taxpayer-funded advertising in West Virginia cannot be filtered through politically biased media monitors.

The legislation, sponsored by State Senator Mike Azinger and passed by the West Virginia Legislature with overwhelming support on March 13, prohibits state agencies from contracting with advertising firms or marketing companies that use so-called “media reliability” or “misinformation” monitors to determine where public advertising dollars may be placed.

The bill specifically targets agencies using groups like leftwing organizations like NewsGuard and GDI.

“Governor Morrisey deserves tremendous credit for standing up for free speech and ensuring that taxpayer dollars are never used to enforce ideological media blacklists,” said Christine Czernejewski, IMC spokesperson said in a statement.

“We also want to thank Sen. Azinger and Delegate Holstein for their commitment to getting this bill passed. By signing SB 531 into law, West Virginia is making clear that diverse voices should be heard and that public funds are used to ensure that all citizens are informed, not a narrow political group.”

SB 531 demonstrates how states can protect free expression, ensure responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars, and maintain a vibrant and diverse media ecosystem. The IMC believes it is a model for other states and expects more to follow suit with similar measures.

See the IMC’s press release.

Legal Victory Restricts State Dept’s Use of Media Monitors; Exposes Govt. Censorship of Conservative Media

A major First Amendment case brought by The Federalist, The Daily Wire, and the State of Texas has resulted in a sweeping settlement with the U.S. Department of State that prevents it from supporting the censorship of American media outlets. The agreement prohibits the State Department from funding, promoting, or coordinating efforts to suppress lawful speech or label domestic outlets as “disinformation.”

The case shed light on a broader network of third-party organizations and tools—including groups like NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index (GDI)—that were used to rate and, in some cases, financially disadvantage news outlets through advertiser pressure.

 

Under the settlement, the State Department is not only significantly limited in its ability to target speech, but also from working through outside groups or technologies to censor or demonetize constitutionally protected speech. The agreement establishes long-term oversight and compliance measures, marking a significant constraint on government-backed “censorship industrial complex” and preventing future administrations from engaging in such activities.

Judge Signals Skepticism in NewsGuard Case Against FTC Probe

A federal judge is signaling reluctance to block a sweeping Federal Trade Commission investigation into NewsGuard.

According to Courthouse News, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich appeared unconvinced that NewsGuard had met the high bar required to halt the probe, allowing the FTC’s inquiry into the company’s business practices to move forward.

NewsGuard has argued the investigation is politically motivated, but the FTC’s probe raises broader questions about transparency, accountability, and the real-world impact these firms have on the news ecosystem.

The case comes as scrutiny grows over the role of media ratings firms in shaping the ad market, particularly whether their scoring systems unfairly disadvantage certain outlets and limit access to advertising revenue.

Landmark Settlement Delivers Blow to Government-Backed Social Media Censorship

Federal officials now face new limits on their ability to pressure social media platforms to suppress lawful speech following legal developments stemming from a landmark First Amendment case.

Murthy v. Biden challenged federal officials’ coordination with social media platforms to suppress lawful speech. The lawsuit alleged that Biden Administration officials in the White House, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency worked with major tech platforms to pressure them into removing or downranking content related to COVID-19, elections, and other political topics.

Among the plaintiffs was Jay Bhattacharya, now head of the National Institutes of Health, whose views on COVID-19 policy were suppressed during the pandemic.

After the Supreme Court dismissed the case on standing grounds, the New Civil Liberties Alliance continued to represent individual plaintiffs. Recent settlements and legal agreements involving those plaintiffs have imposed limits on how certain federal agencies communicate with social media companies.

Following these developments, Bhattacharya wrote on X that the outcome represents a “major victory for free speech” and a critical step toward preventing the government from pressuring platforms to silence dissenting scientific and political viewpoints.

The case was originally brought by then–Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt. Reacting to the outcome, Schmitt said on X that the lawsuit exposed government collusion with Big Tech to “silence” Americans and called the result a major First Amendment victory.

Federal Judge Halts Nexstar Merger as Legal Challenges, Criticism Mounts

A federal judge has temporarily blocked Nexstar Media Group’s $6.2 billion acquisition of Tegna, marking a significant escalation in the legal and political battle over one of the largest media consolidation efforts in U.S. history.

In granting a temporary restraining order, the court found that plaintiff DirecTV is likely to succeed in its antitrust claims, concluding the merger could “substantially lessen competition” in local television markets and drive higher costs for consumers.

DirecTV argued the deal would dramatically increase Nexstar’s leverage in negotiations with cable and satellite providers, enabling the company to demand higher retransmission fees and impose more frequent blackouts—costs that would ultimately be passed on to Americans.

The ruling comes amid a wave of opposition.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, rebuked the FCC for approving the merger without a full commission vote. “I believe it should have been a full commission vote,” Sen. Cruz said, raising concerns that regulators bypassed proper process to waive statutory ownership limits.

Senators Cruz and Cantwell (D-WA), the committee’s ranking member, sent a letter to FCC Chair Brendan Carr, stating that the agency’s action “raises serious concerns about the Commission’s use of delegated authority in matters involving significant legal, policy, and economic consequences.”

A coalition of state attorneys general has filed suit to block the merger, while Newsmax and six state cable associations have challenged the FCC’s approval in federal court.  The National Religious Broadcasters (NRB), CPAC and the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), have filed amicus curiae briefs supporting the petitioners.

Experts warn the deal would give Nexstar reach into roughly 80% of U.S. households—far exceeding the long-standing 39% ownership cap set by Congress.

The court also credited arguments that the merger could reduce local news competition and lead to newsroom consolidation, layoffs and diminished viewpoint diversity.

News Advertising Isn’t the Risk Advertisers Think It Is

The advertising industry’s core assumption that news content is unsafe for brands is wrong.

According to a 2025 Advertising Impact Study, 57% of self-described news junkies—about a quarter of the US population – are following the news more closely than before. What’s more is that 43% of the broader U.S. population reports consuming more news than a year ago.

Despite surging news consumption, advertisers continue to use media monitors, resulting in ad dollars being directed away from news platforms due to overly broad “brand safety” concerns.

But the data tells a different story. As a recent Adweek column argues, news environments deliver higher engagement, longer attention, and stronger brand recall than many other forms of digital content.

The disconnect is clear: as audiences increasingly turn to trusted news sources, ad spending continues to flow elsewhere.

MEDIA

West Virginia Gov. Morrisey Signs Bill Targeting Censorship, Blow to NewsGuard
By Newsmax Wires, 4/6/26
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/west-virginia-patrick-morrisey-bill/2026/04/06/id/1251918/

NCLA, Daily Wire, The Federalist

Clip on NewsGuard/GDI’s Impact, 4/1/26

https://x.com/nclalegal/status/2039347659639591140?s=46&t=G03lWia6XTIMr8KilO2lig

The Daily Wire Wins Landmark Free Speech Victory in Censorship Lawsuit Against State Department

The Daily Wire by Luke Rosiak, 4/1/26

https://www.dailywire.com/news/state-dept-reaches-censorship-settlement-with-daily-wire

 

The Federalist Scored a Huge Win for Free Speech – and Exposed More of the Censorship Industrial Complex

The Federalist by Margot Cleveland, 4/1/26

https://thefederalist.com/2026/04/01/the-federalist-scored-a-huge-win-for-free-speech-and-exposed-more-of-the-censorship-industrial-complex/

 

Sens. Cruz, Cantwell Hit FCC’s Carr on Nexstar Merger

Newsmax Wires, 4/1/26

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/ted-cruz-maria-cantwell-fcc/2026/03/31/id/1251416/

 

US Judge Orders Nexstar to Hold Tegna Separate Pending Review

Reuters by David Shepardson, 3/27/26

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/us-judge-orders-nexstar-hold-tegna-separate-pending-review-2026-03-28/

 

Finally, Good News. Free Speech Wins Big in Court

Racket News by Matt Taibbi, 3/25/26

https://www.racket.news/p/finally-good-news-free-speech-wins?triedRedirect=true

 

The Trump Administration’s First Amendment Promise

Washington Post Editorial, 3/25/26

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/03/25/social-media-censorship-consent-murthy-missouri-doj/

 

Ted Cruz Criticizes FCC on Nexstar Merger, No Full Vote

Newsmax Wires, 3/24/26

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/ted-cruz-fcc-nexstar/2026/03/24/id/1250658/

 

Media Research Center: Google News Massively Biased, Just 2% of Top Morning Stories From Conservative Outlets

Breitbart by Lucas Nolan, 3/18/26

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2026/03/18/media-research-center-google-news-massively-biased-98-of-top-morning-stories-from-left-leaning-outlets/

 

Bill Targeting ‘Media Monitors’ Heads to the West Virginia Governor’s Desk

The Daily Signal by Fred Lucas, 3/17/26

https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/03/17/bill-targeting-media-monitors-heads-to-the-west-virginia-governors-desk/

 

Apple News goes from 0% to 2% content from right-leaning outlets after FTC pushback

Washington Times by Valerie Richardson, 3/9/26

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/mar/9/apple-news-goes-0-2-content-right-leaning-outlets-ftc-pushback/?utm_medium=subscriber&utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_campaign=evening&utm_content=paywall&bt_ee=Lph%2FArkwdNUWf1DqceoS%2FW%2Bv9N2VJ8SF%2F54zXAADDwD5ZHDTi2F9c3ue7qqqyvBM&bt_ts=1773089432731

 

Everything You Know About News Advertising is Wrong

Adweek By Lou Paskalis, 3/4/26

https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/everything-you-know-about-news-advertising-is-wrong/

 

Judge Signal Reluctance to Block Broad FTC Probe NewsGuard Calls Retaliation

Courthouse News Service by Ryan Knappenberger, 3/4/26

Judge signals reluctance to block broad FTC probe NewsGuard calls retaliation

 

 

March 2026 Newsletter

NewsGuard & Censorship Update

March 2026 Report

Inside This Edition:

  • West Virginia Senate Passes Bill to Block State Use of Media Monitors
  • States Push Back on Ideological Blacklists in Ad Spending
  • Feeling Pressure, NewsGuard Sues FTC Over Investigation into Its Practices
  • FTC Warns Apple About Major Bias on its News App Following Study
  • Senate Commerce Hearing Reveals Lawmakers Side with Congressional Authority on Broadcast Caps
  • National Religious Broadcasters Address Censorship of Conservative Media at Annual Conference
  • NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup

OVERVIEW

This month saw another victory in the fight against taxpayer-funded censorship and media blacklisting. In West Virginia, the state Senate overwhelmingly passed the First Amendment Preservation Act, a bill that prevents that state from contracting with media monitors or companies that use them.

Policymakers are increasingly recognizing that modern censorship doesn’t usually come through direct bans, but through intermediaries and opaque gatekeeping mechanisms that shape who gets heard and who gets cut off. The good news is that they also want this activity to stop. Across the country, activity is heating up in the states as lawmakers move to keep public advertising dollars from being routed through ideologically driven monitoring systems.

At the same time, pressure continues to mount at the federal level, where regulators, lawmakers, and the public are paying closer attention to how platforms, media monitors, and consolidated media power influence news distribution and advertising decisions. Ongoing scrutiny of rating services, platform bias, and broadcast consolidation reflects a growing concern about transparency, accountability, and the health of the information ecosystem itself. Together, these developments point to a shift in how the free speech debate is being waged in 2026—not just defending individual voices, but confronting the systems that control reach, revenue, and legitimacy in today’s media landscape. Keep reading for the latest developments.

GOVERNMENT

West Virginia Senate Passes Bill to Block State Use of Media Monitors

The West Virginia Senate delivered a major win for a free press and local economies in the Mountain State, passing the First Amendment Preservation Act (SB 531) by an overwhelming 30–2 vote.

The bill blocks state agencies and contractors from using politically biased media rating and monitoring services that function as de facto blacklists, steering taxpayer-funded advertising based on ideology rather than performance and reach.

The IMC praised the Senate’s action, noting the measure strengthens First Amendment protections while supporting a healthy, independent media ecosystem and local economies.

“This is an important step towards strengthening the First Amendment and ensuring good stewardship of taxpayer dollars,” said IMC spokesperson Christine Czernejewski. “West Virginia lawmakers are standing up for a free and independent press while also strengthening local economies. We especially want to thank Sen. Mike Azinger for his leadership in spearheading this bill.”

The IMC is now urging the West Virginia House of Delegates to take up SB 531 and help set a national example for protecting free speech and viewpoint diversity in media.

States Push Back on Ideological Blacklists in Ad Spending

The Florida House of Representatives passed a provision in the state budget that blocks state agencies from contracting with advertising firms that rely on partisan media monitoring services.

Last year, Florida lawmakers enacted—and Governor Ron DeSantis signed—a similar budget provision. That move marked a major victory for free speech, viewpoint diversity, and responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars.

The IMC believes lawmakers should pass it again this year to ensure these protections remain in place and to reaffirm Florida’s leadership on this issue.

Building on the momentum, South Carolina is also considering a budgetary provision to prevent state advertising dollars from being influenced by ideologically driven rating and monitoring services.

The IMC will keep you informed on developments in the states on this issue.

Feeling Pressure, NewsGuard Sues FTC Over Investigation into Its Practices

NewsGuard is pushing back against a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigation by suing the agency in federal court. In its complaint, NewsGuard claims the FTC’s year-long probe and demands for internal documents are unconstitutional and amount to retaliation.

But many observers — including a recent editorial in the New York Post — argue that the FTC’s scrutiny is justified and overdue given longstanding concerns that NewsGuard and similar media monitors act as censors.

The FTC’s willingness to investigate these practices — rather than defer to private media monitors — reflects growing recognition of the need for greater transparency and accountability in how advertising decisions are influenced and how public dollars are spent.

FTC Warns Apple About Major Bias on its News App Following Study

The Federal Trade Commission has formally warned Apple and CEO Tim Cook about evidence that its Apple News app displays significant ideological bias, based on new research showing the platform consistently favors left-of-center outlets while minimizing conservative and independent news sources. The FTC letter suggests that if Apple represents its service as a neutral news aggregator but presents a skewed editorial outcome, it could run afoul of the FTC Act’s prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices.

This development follows in-depth analysis by the Media Research Center (MRC) – an IMC member – which documented systemic imbalances in how Apple News curates content. According to MRC’s research, stories from conservative and non-mainstream outlets are far less likely to appear prominently, even when those stories are widely circulated elsewhere. In fact, MRC found no top stories from conservative sources were featured in January 2026, while 440 stories were classified as left-leaning.

“For too long, platforms like Apple News have cloaked editorial favoritism in the language of neutrality,” said Dan Schneider, Senior Vice President at the Media Research Center. “Our research shows that what Apple presents as a fair news feed is anything but. We’re grateful to see the FTC scrutinizing practices that distort the information landscape and undermine viewpoint diversity.”

When a dominant platform with millions of users shapes what news people see — without clear standards or oversight — the implications extend far beyond market competition and into the heart of democratic discourse.

Senate Commerce Hearing Reveals Lawmakers Side with Congressional Authority on Broadcast Caps

A recent Senate Commerce Committee hearing made clear — with rare bipartisan agreement — that the 39% national TV ownership cap was set by Congress, and regulators cannot rewrite it on their own. Lawmakers from both parties emphasized that any change to the cap must come from Congress, and that major decisions affecting it should be made by the full FCC in a formal vote, not at the bureau level.

Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy testified at the hearing, arguing that the cap serves as an important check against excessive consolidation. Ruddy warned that efforts to reinterpret or relax the rule could undermine local media diversity and overstep congressional authority.

“If the FCC tries to rewrite the law without congressional approval, we’re prepared to take that all the way to the Supreme Court,” said Ruddy.

Ruddy’s comments came in the context of Nexstar Media Group’s proposed $6 billion acquisition of Tegna, a deal that would push Nexstar past the existing ownership threshold. His testimony underscored the view that any action affecting the cap — including merger reviews — must be rooted in law and transparent process.

Representatives of the National Association of Broadcasters also testified, generally advocating for modernized ownership rules, but the hearing’s bipartisan tone made it clear that any such changes face considerable procedural and legal hurdles.

National Religious Broadcasters Address Censorship of Conservative Media at Annual Conference

The National Religious Broadcasters addressed the censorship of Christian media at their annual conference, held last month in Nashville. A panel titled, “Religious Censorship: Where Are We in the Current Environment?” examined the growing pressures facing faith-based voices in today’s media and tech landscape.

The discussion featured American Principles Project senior fellow Alexis Wilkins, National Review columnist Caroline Downey, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, and The Daily Signal President Rob Bluey—who also serves as IMC’s treasurer—with The Daily Signal’s Tyler O’Neil moderating.

Panelists explored how religious viewpoints are increasingly sidelined or restricted across digital platforms, advertising channels, and public discourse—and what that means for free expression, pluralism, and the future of faith in the public square.

Bluey focused on the blacklisting of conservative and Christian media by media monitoring services like NewsGuard, warning that these rating systems are being used as ideological gatekeepers that quietly cut off lawful outlets from advertising and distribution. The conversation highlighted both the scope of the problem and the growing pushback against censorship of faith-based voices.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

MEDIA

 

Stop Taxpayer-Funded Censorship in West Virginia

The Parkersburg News and Sentinel by State Sen. Mike Azinger

https://www.newsandsentinel.com/opinion/local-columns/2026/02/op-ed-stop-taxpayer-funded-censorship-in-west-virginia/

 

State Department Works to Revoke Visa of UK operative Who Allegedly Censored The Federalist, Other Americans

The Federalist by Paul D. Thacker, 2/23/26

https://thefederalist.com/2026/02/23/state-department-works-to-revoke-visa-of-u-k-operative-who-allegedly-censored-the-federalist-other-americans/

 

Media Censorship of Christians Still a Problem, Says Panel

The Washington Stand by S.A. McCarthy, 2/20/26

https://washingtonstand.com/article/media-censorship-of-christians-still-a-problem-says-panel

 

Protect Local Voices and Businesses: Keep Taxpayer Ads Out of Ideological Blacklists

Lootpress by IMC’s Christine Czernejewski, 2/19/26

https://www.lootpress.com/protect-local-voices-and-businesses-keep-taxpayer-ads-out-of-ideological-blacklists/

 

Big Four News Apps, Including Apple News, Go Silent on FTC Apple Rebuke

MRC by Catherin Salgado, 2/19/26

https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/catherine-salgado/2026/02/19/big-four-news-apps-including-apple-news-go-silent

 

West Virginia Senate Passes Bill to Block Media Monitors

Newsmax by Charlie McCarthy, 2/17/26

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/west-virginia-senate-bill/2026/02/17/id/1246442/

 

FTC Must Keep Up the Fight Against NewsGuard and Its ‘Disinformation Graft’

NY Post Editorial, 2/17/26

https://nypost.com/2026/02/17/opinion/ftc-must-keep-up-the-fight-against-newsguard-and-its-disinformation-graft/

 

Dershowitz, Linehan, Kirk Honored at RealClearPolitics 2026 Samizdat Prize Gala

RealClearPolitics Video, 2/17/26

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2026/02/17/dershowitz_linehan_kirk_honored_at_realclearpolitics_2026_samizdat_prize_gala.html

 

State Fires a Shot Against ‘Blacklisting’ Conservative Media

Daily Signal by Fred Lucas, 2/15/26

https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/02/15/this-state-fires-a-shot-against-blacklisting-conservative-media/

 

FTC Chairman Warns Political Bias in Apple News App May Violate Consumer Protection Laws

NY Post by Thomas Barrabi, 2/11/26

https://nypost.com/2026/02/11/business/ftc-chairman-warns-that-political-bias-in-apple-news-app-may-violate-consumer-protection-laws/

 

Senators Reaffirm 39% Broadcast Cap at Hearing on FCC Broadcast Rule

By Newsmax Wires, 2/10/26

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/fcc-senate-hearing/2026/02/10/id/1245653/

 

Rating Site Sues Trump Admin Over Probe of Alleged Suppression of Conservative Media

Daily Signal by Fred Lucas, 2/9/26

Rating Site Sues Trump Admin Over Probe of Alleged Suppression of Conservative Media

 

Europeans Testify on How Europe is Banning Americans from Saying What They Beliece

The Federalist by Joy Pullman, 2/4/26

https://thefederalist.com/2026/02/04/europeans-testify-on-how-europe-is-banning-americans-from-saying-what-they-believe/

 

 

 

 

 

February 2026 Newsletter

NewsGuard & Censorship Update

 

February 2026 Report

Inside This Edition:

  • West Virginia Introduces Bill to Block State Use of Media Monitors
  • FTC Continues Investigation; NewsGuard Pushes Back
  • House Vote Preserves Taxpayer-Funded Censorship Pipeline
  • Religious Broadcasters Warn FCC Against TV Consolidation; Senate Commerce Hearing on Impact of Lifting Broadcast Caps on Feb 10
  • RealClear Announces Samizdat Prize Winners, Exemplars of Free Speech Courage
  • Join IMC’s Fight to Protect the Free Press
  • NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup

 

OVERVIEW

This month’s IMC report highlights efforts at the state and federal levels to confront taxpayer-funded censorship and media blacklisting. From new legislation in West Virginia aimed at blocking state reliance on partisan media monitors to growing resistance against broadcast consolidation, the fight over free speech infrastructure is intensifying.

We also spotlight RealClearPolitics’ announcement of its 2026 Samizdat Prize winners, honoring individuals who have demonstrated exceptional courage in defense of the First Amendment, as well as key developments in how censorship continues to shape advertising, public policy, and access to information.

Together, these developments underscore a central reality: censorship today rarely looks like government bans—it operates through ratings systems, financial pressure, and intermediaries, often with public funds. IMC remains focused on exposing and dismantling these mechanisms to protect a genuinely free and independent press.

GOVERNMENT

West Virginia Introduces Legislation to Block State Use of Media Monitors

Legislation was introduced in West Virginia this month to prohibit state ads from going to companies that use politically biased media monitors such as NewsGuard. The IMC supported bills, SB. 531 and HB 4746, will stop this form of taxpayer-funded censorship, which distorts advertising markets and limits viewpoint diversity.

The West Virginia proposal follows action taken in Florida last year, where lawmakers enacted—and Gov. Ron DeSantis signed—a budget provision prohibiting state agencies from working with advertising firms that rely on partisan media monitoring services. That move – backed by the IMC – was widely viewed as a model for states seeking to safeguard taxpayer dollars from being used to enforce ideological speech controls.

With growing scrutiny of media monitors at both the federal and state levels, IMC expects additional states to introduce similar legislation in the coming months as policymakers move to protect free speech, restore balance in public advertising, and ensure state funds are not funneled through biased intermediaries.

FTC Continues Investigation, NewsGuard Pushes Back

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is pressing forward with its investigation into alleged advertising boycotts of conservative websites. The inquiry examines whether digital advertising groups coordinated actions to withhold ad revenue from certain media outlets — conduct the FTC says may raise legal questions under antitrust law.

A central point in the dispute involves NewsGuard, which supplies media-reliability ratings widely used by advertisers. On January 15, FTC staff reiterated requests for detailed information, including the identities of NewsGuard’s customers and communications with them, as well as related documents. In response, NewsGuard filed a petition on January 16 seeking to overturn or quash the agency’s information request, arguing it infringes on its First Amendment rights by compelling disclosure of speech-related activities.

The IMC will continue to monitor and report on developments surrounding this investigation.

House Vote Preserves Taxpayer-Funded Censorship Pipeline

Earlier this month, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 291–127 to reject an amendment that would have defunded the National Endowment for Democracy (NED)—a congressionally funded nonprofit tied to the censorship and demonetization of conservative voices.

During consideration of a January 14–15 government funding package, Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) introduced an amendment to eliminate NED’s more than $300 million annual budget. The effort failed after 81 Republicans joined 210 Democrats to preserve funding.

As documented in a recent report by Foundation for Freedom Online (FFO), NED—originally created during the Cold War to support democracy abroad—has, since 2016, helped finance the global “counter-disinformation” industry that directly censors American speech. Most notably, NED funded the Global Disinformation Index (GDI), a British organization that built advertiser blacklists targeting conservative U.S. media outlets, including Newsmax, The Federalist, The Daily Wire, The Blaze, RealClearPolitics, and the New York Post.

According to FFO, in reports to NED, GDI bragged that its efforts helped reduce President Trump’s reach on social media while he was still in office and contributed to an estimated $70 million revenue loss for targeted outlets. Financial blacklisting of disfavored media has since become one of the most powerful tools of modern censorship.

NED has also bankrolled the development of foreign censorship regimes in places like the European Union and Brazil—regimes that are now exerting pressure on American platforms and speakers, despite such restrictions being unconstitutional in the United States.

By voting to continue funding NED, Congress chose to preserve a largely opaque, taxpayer-funded operation that has played a documented role in censoring conservative speech. The vote underscores how difficult it remains to unwind the censorship infrastructure that now operates through nonprofits, advertisers, and foreign governments—often with U.S. taxpayer support.

Religious Broadcasters Warn FCC Against TV Consolidation; Senate Commerce Hearing on Impact of Lifting Broadcast Cap on Feb. 10

The National Religious Broadcasters (NRB)—representing more than 1,100 Christian broadcasters and media organizations—has filed with the FCC opposing any effort to lift the national television ownership cap, warning that massive consolidation would endanger conservative and faith-based voices.

NRB’s filing places the influential organization in direct opposition to the proposed Nexstar–Tegna merger, which would create the largest TV station group in U.S. history. The group cautioned that removing the 39% national ownership cap would undermine competition, localism, and viewpoint diversity—especially harming independent and mission-driven broadcasters.

NRB also stressed that any change to the ownership cap must be made by Congress, not the FCC. Legal scholars have echoed this view, noting that the cap was set by statute and that the FCC lacks the authority to unilaterally eliminate or weaken it.

The filing adds to growing conservative opposition to broadcast consolidation, including from lawmakers  –  most recently Rep. Elise Stefanik – and media organizations concerned that further concentration would give a handful of large, often liberal-leaning companies outsized control over local news and programming.

The US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation will hold a hearing on the caps on February 11.

RealClear Announces Samizdat Prize Winners; Exemplars of Free Speech Courage

RealClearPolitics has announced the 2026 winners of its Samizdat Prizes, honoring individuals who have demonstrated exceptional courage in defense of the First Amendment and free expression. The awards will be formally presented at the Samizdat Prize Gala on February 11, 2026, at The Breakers in Palm Beach, Florida, as part of RealClear’s 25th anniversary celebration.

The Samizdat Prizes take their name from samizdat—the underground publishing networks in the Soviet Union that circulated banned writing—symbolizing the enduring fight for free speech in the face of censorship and institutional pressure.

This year’s winners are:

  • Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, recognized posthumously for his outspoken advocacy for free speech and viewpoint diversity.
  • Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Law School professor and civil liberties advocate, honored for a long record of defending free expression even under pressure.
  • Graham Linehan, the Irish comedy writer known for his contentious clashes with cancel culture and defense of speech rights.

Through these awards, RealClear spotlights journalists, writers, scholars, and public figures who have stood firm for open debate and viewpoint diversity despite professional or personal cost. Click here for details about the Samizdat Prizes.

Join IMC’s Fight to Protect the Free Press

The Independent Media Council works to defend free speech and a free press at the structural level—where modern censorship increasingly operates. Today, speech is often suppressed through media monitoring firms and advertiser blacklists that stigmatize and financially starve lawful media outlets based on ideology. These opaque systems quietly shape which voices are heard, often with the involvement of taxpayer dollars.

IMC confronts this censorship through coordinated advocacy, legislative engagement, and public accountability. In just one year, IMC has helped drive meaningful progress at both the state and federal levels, with growing momentum nationwide. We invite current members to renew and new supporters to join us. Learn more here!

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

MEDIA

 

FTC Extends Ad Boycott Probe a Judge Said Violates Free Speech

Bloomberg by Leah Nylen, 1/22/26

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-22/ftc-extends-ad-boycott-probe-a-judge-said-violates-free-speech?embedded-checkout=true

 

UK’s ‘Disinformation’ Control Still Censorship

Newsmax by Duvi Honig, 1/20/26

https://www.newsmax.com/duvihonig/bbc-working-only/2026/01/20/id/1242879/

 

Religious Broadcasters Urge FCC to Keep TV Caps

Newsmax Wires 1/19/26

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/religious-broadcasters-fcc-tv-caps/2026/01/19/id/1242748/

 

Buckle Up: Will Apple-Google Deal Pave Way for Most Sinister AI Yet?

MRC By Catherine Salgado 1/16/26

https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/catherine-salgado/2026/01/16/buckle-will-apple-google-deal-pave-way-most-sinister

 

RealClear Samizdat Prize Gala Celebrates First Amendment Courage – and RCP’s 25th Anniversary

RealClear Politics by David DesRosiers, 1/10/26

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2026/01/10/realclear_samizdat_prize_gala_celebrates_first_amendment_courage_rcps_25th_anniversary_153697.html

January 2026 Newsletter

January 2026 Report

Inside This Edition:

Congress Blocks Media Monitors in 2026 Defense Bill, a Free Speech Win

Media Research Center: Apple News is Suppressing Right-Leaning Media

CPAC to Feds: Lifting Broadcast Caps Would Hurt Viewpoint Diversity, Local News

Join IMC’s Fight to Protect a Free Press, Free Speech in the New Year

NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup

OVERVIEW

The Independent Media Council enters the new year with growing momentum in the fight to protect free speech and a free press. This edition highlights several major developments that underscore why IMC’s work is urgently needed—and demonstrates the organization’s effectiveness in its first year as a nonprofit.

Among the most significant is Congress’s passage of a strengthened anti-censorship provision in the FY 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, which blocks the Pentagon from working with ad agencies that rely on biased media monitoring firms like NewsGuard. We also examine new findings from Media Research Center showing that Apple News continues to exclude right-leaning outlets from its most prominent placements, raising serious concerns about digital gatekeeping.

This issue also covers CPAC’s formal filing with the Federal Communications Commission, warning that lifting national broadcast ownership caps would further concentrate media power, weaken local journalism, and reduce viewpoint diversity nationwide.

These developments illustrate the scope and scale of the challenges facing independent and conservative media—and the growing need for coordinated action. Over the past year, IMC has translated that urgency into tangible results:

·       IMC successfully pushed the Federal Trade Commission to include explicit protections against viewpoint discrimination in its approval of the Omnicom–IPG merger, preventing them from blacklisting media outlets based on ideology.

·       At the state level, IMC helped secure a major free-speech win in Florida, where lawmakers enacted—and Gov. Ron DeSantis signed—a budget provision blocking state agencies from contracting with advertising firms that rely on partisan media monitoring services.

·       IMC helped secure the aforementioned NDAA provision.

Together, these efforts reinforce a simple truth: when we work together, we can push back against ideological gatekeepers and restore fairness to the media and advertising marketplace. As censorship tactics continue to evolve, IMC remains focused on action, coordinated advocacy, and real policy outcomes that protect free speech for all.

GOVERNMENT

Congress Blocks Media Monitors in 2026 Defense Bill, a Win for Free Speech

Congress passed the FY 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) with a critical provision that prevents the Department of Defense from contracting with advertising agencies that rely on biased media monitoring services in military recruitment campaigns.

With this action, Congress has ensured that ideologically slanted gatekeepers will have no role in military recruitment campaigns.

 

“Major advertising agencies have been effectively censoring conservative media by blocking ads and their revenues,” Christine Czernejewski, IMC spokesperson said in.  “We applaud Congress for taking the stand to oppose such censorship when it comes to military recruitment advertising. The Congress acted to make sure all Americans see these ads – and stopping leftwing ratings groups like NewsGuard from targeting conservative media.”

This year’s NDAA provision is even stronger than the one Congress adopted in 2023, as it includes an enforcement mechanism that ensures compliance and prevents workarounds by advertising firms

Senators Tommy Tuberville and Eric Schmitt in the Senate and Rep. Rich McCormick, as well as Armed Services Chairmen Sen. Roger Wicker and Rep. Mike Rogers spearheaded the effort. Their leadership ensured that protections for free speech remain firmly in the NDAA.

 

The IMC urges Congress to continue denying federal funds to ad agencies that engage in censorship.

·       See IMC’s press release

·       Read the NDAA Anti-Censorship Provision:

 SEC. 1555. CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT REGARDING CONTRACTING

FOR MILITARY RECRUITING.

(a) CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. Prior to the Secretary of

Defense entering into any contract or other agreement (or extending,

renewing, or otherwise modifying an existing contract or other

agreement) with an entity for the purpose of that entity placing

military recruitment advertisements on behalf of the Department

of Defense, the Secretary shall require, as a condition of such

contract or agreement, that the entity certify to the Secretary

that the entity does not—

1.                      rate or rank news or information sources for the factual accuracy of their content;

2.                      provide ratings or opinions on news or information sources regarding misinformation, bias, adherence to journalistic standards, or ethics; or

3.                      acquire or use any service that provides any ratings, rankings, or opinions described in paragraph (1) or (2) from any other person for military recruiting contracts.

(b) SUNSET.—The requirement under this section shall terminate on December 31, 2030.

 

Media Research Center: Apple News Suppresses of Right-Leaning Media

 

A new analysis from the Media Research Center’s Free Speech America project finds that Apple News continues to systematically exclude right-leaning outlets from its most prominent news placements, extending what researchers describe as an ongoing embargo into December.

According to MRC’s review of Apple News’ top featured stories from December 1–14, not a single article from a right-leaning media outlet appeared among the platform’s top 20 featured stories each morning. Instead, Apple News consistently promoted content from left-leaning and establishment outlets, including The Washington Post, NBC News, NPR, The Guardian, and similar sources.

The report also notes that Apple News’ editorially curated content during this period focused heavily on political coverage—particularly stories critical of President Trump and conservative policy positions—raising further concerns about ideological imbalance in one of the nation’s most influential news aggregation platforms.

As millions of Americans increasingly rely on digital news aggregators to shape their understanding of current events, MRC – an IMC member – warns that editorial gatekeeping by powerful tech platforms like Apple poses serious risks to viewpoint diversity, media competition, and free expression.

·       See MRC’s report here.

CPAC to Feds: Lifting Broadcast Caps Would Hurt Viewpoint Diversity, Local News

 

The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) has formally urged federal regulators to reject any effort to weaken or eliminate long-standing national broadcast ownership limits, warning that further consolidation would undermine viewpoint diversity and accelerate the decline of local journalism.

In a filing with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as part of the agency’s Quadrennial Review of its broadcast ownership rules, CPAC argued that lifting the 39% national television ownership cap would allow a small number of dominant media conglomerates to control the vast majority of local TV stations across the country. Such consolidation, CPAC warned, would reduce independent voices, crowd out local reporting, and further centralize editorial decision-making in the hands of a few powerful networks.

CPAC’s filing echoes the views of prominent legal scholars and media outlets who argue that the FCC does not have the legal authority to raise or eliminate the national broadcast ownership cap. .

Legal experts note that Congress explicitly set the 39% cap in federal statute, meaning any attempt by the FCC to change it unilaterally would exceed the agency’s regulatory authority and likely violate federal law. Courts have repeatedly ruled that administrative agencies cannot override clear congressional intent through rulemaking.

·       Read CPAC’s Blog on its FCC Filing

Earlier this month, Newsmax filed a petition with the FCC, asking them to block the proposed merger between Nexstar and TEGNA, arguing that the merger would violate federal law, harm competition, raise prices for consumers and damage local news. At the heart of the matter is that the merger would violate the cap set by Congress.

The FCC has not yet indicated how it will proceed on the Nexstar-TEGNA aplications.

Join IMC’s Fight to Protect the Free Press, Free Speech in the New Year

The Independent Media Council stands for free speech and the free press. That means pushing back against media monitoring organizations that blacklist, stigmatize, and financially starve independent and conservative media outlets. Groups like NewsGuard and similar ratings firms act as ideological gatekeepers—pressuring advertisers, platforms, and government agencies to cut off lawful media voices based on subjective and opaque standards.

 

IMC confronts this censorship head-on through coordinated advocacy, policy engagement, and public accountability. In one year, we’ve had significant victories at both the federal and state levels – and we’re just getting started.

 

As we head into the new year, we ask that our current members sign up for a renewal and that prospective members join us. The fight against media blacklisting is ongoing—and we are strongest when we work together. Click here to join!

 

MEDIA

 

Zombie-like Pols and Officials want to Eat Your Brain – and Destroy Free Speech

NY Post by James Bovard, 1/5/26

https://nypost.com/2026/01/05/opinion/zombie-like-pols-and-officials-want-to-eat-your-brain-and-destroy-free-speech/

 

Newsmax Urges FCC to Block Nexstar Merger, Cites Legal Violations

By Newsmax Wires, 1/1/26

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/newsmax-nexstar-block/2026/01/01/id/1240469/

 

‘We are the Free World Now’ – Europe Declares War on Free Speech in the US

The Hill by Jonathan Turley, 12/27/25

https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/5663912-we-are-the-free-world-now-europe-declares-war-on-free-speech-in-the-us/

 

Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales Claims No Ban on Right-Leaning Sources, Describes One Anyway

MRC by Tom Olohan, 12/19/25

https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/tom-olohan/2025/12/19/wikipedias-jimmy-wales-claims-no-ban-right-leaning-sources

 

NDAA’s Anti-Censorship Provision Protects Free Speech

By Newsmax Wires, 12/17/25 (Also ran in RealClear Politics)

https://www.newsmax.com/us/congress-ndaa-newsguard/2025/12/16/id/1238509/

 

Ted Cruz Tells FCC to Avoid Moves That Could ‘Chill’ Protected Speech

Washington Times by Tom Howell Jr., 12/17/25

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2025/dec/17/ted-cruz-tells-fcc-avoid-moves-could-chill-protected-speech/

 

CPAC Urges FCC to Preserve TV Ownership Caps, Limit Big Networks

By Newsmax Wires, 12/17/25

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/fcc-cpac-media-ownership-cap/2025/12/17/id/1238702/

December 2025 Newsletter

December 2025 Report

Inside This Edition:

  • Congress Closer to Blocking Biased Media Monitors in FY2026 NDAA

  • U.S. Taxpayer Funds Channeled into Global ‘Information Disorder’ Initiative
  • FCC Considers Lifting Broadcast Caps, Threatening Viewpoint Diversity
  • NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup
OVERVIEW
As 2025 draws to a close, efforts to reshape the media landscape and push back against media censorship are accelerating on several fronts.
In the nation’s capital, Congress is closer to advancing a strengthened prohibition against the use of biased media monitors in federal military advertising and recruiting campaigns, marking another significant step toward dismantling the censorship-industrial complex. The IMC will be pursuing similar actions to stop biased media monitors at the state level in the new year.
Also in Washington, the FCC is considering a dramatic rollback of long-standing broadcast ownership limits, a move that would concentrate unprecedented power over local news in the hands of a few national corporations.
New reporting also reveals how U.S. taxpayer dollars continue to support foreign organizations working to export “information disorder” frameworks that label mainstream political outcomes as societal failures.
The IMC’s work is essential: we must protect conservative and independent journalism and defend a free and open media marketplace against government-aligned censorship efforts—at home and abroad. Please help us spread the word about the IMC and encourage aligned media outlets and organizations to join. Learn more here: imcamerica.com
GOVERNMENT
Congress One Step Closer to Blocking Biased Media Monitors in 2026 National Defense Authorization Act
The two Chambers of Congress will meet soon to reconcile their versions of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The bill is expected to include a provision that prevents the Department of Defense from contracting with advertising firms that rely on biased media monitoring services such as NewsGuard in military recruiting campaigns.
Building on the same measure that Congress passed in 2023, this version includes an enforcement mechanism that ensures compliance and prevents workarounds by advertising firms.
The IMC applauds this measure and will keep you posted on the latest action.
U.S. Taxpayer Funds Channeled into Global ‘Information Disorder’ Initiative
BBC Media Action—the charitable arm of Britain’s public broadcaster—received roughly $3.4 million from USAID to support its global “information disorder” agenda, according to Foundation for Freedom Online (FFO).  This is about 8% of the group’s income in 2023-24.
While BBC Media Action frames its work as building resilience to misleading or harmful content, the terms and scope of its strategy raise questions for domestic policy and media independence. The group published a report explicitly identifying the 2016 election of Donald Trump and the U.K.’s Brexit vote as emblematic of failures in information governance—thus positioning itself not just as a broadcaster, but as an actor in shaping public discourse.
When U.S. taxpayer dollars help fund foreign organizations that label major democratic outcomes it risks importing foreign speech norms into American policy debates. It also expands the reach of the censorship-industrial complex, underscoring the need to fight back.
FCC Considers Lifting Broadcast Caps, Threatening Viewpoint Diversity
The FCC is weighing whether to lift long-standing national broadcast ownership limits—an action that would reshape the media landscape in ways deeply harmful to local journalism and viewpoint diversity.
Removing the 39% national ownership cap would allow a handful of major broadcasters to control most local TV stations across the country. Doing so would replicate the failures seen in past media consolidation: fewer independent voices, less community-focused reporting, and a dramatic increase in syndicated or centralized content that sidelines local perspectives.
President Trump recently weighed in, warning his own FCC chairman not to lift the cap, saying that if anything, the cap should be smaller. Trump also said that lifting the caps would allow radical left networks to enlarge.
Legal experts, including respected conservative legal scholar Brian T. Fitzpatrick, argue that the FCC may not have the authority to raise or eliminate the cap at all. Congress explicitly set the 39% limit in statute, meaning any attempt by the agency to dissolve it could violate federal law. Even FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr has acknowledged the gravity of the issue, stressing that no formal decision has been made.
For groups committed to protecting independent journalism and resisting centralized control over information, the potential move by the FCC would be disastrous.
MEDIA

CNN’s Scott Jennings Rips Kara Swisher for Claiming Censorship of The Post’s Hunter Biden Laptop Story Was ‘Politics’

The NY Post by Ariel Zilber, 11/24/25

https://nypost.com/2025/11/24/media/cnns-scott-jennings-rips-kara-swisher-for-defending-censorship-of-hunter-biden-laptop-story/

 

Trump Says ‘No Expansion’ for Big TV Networks, Supports Newsmax

Newsmax Wire, 11/23/25

Https://www.newsmax.com/us/fcc-nextstar-media/2025/11/23/id/1235753/

The Culture Wars Didn’t ‘Come For Wikipedia.’ Wikipedia Is Fueling Them With Lies

The Federalist by Mary Vought, 11/19/25

https://thefederalist.com/2025/11/19/the-culture-wars-didnt-come-for-wikipedia-wikipedia-is-fueling-them-with-lies/

Newsmax CEO Ruddy: FCC Lifting TV Cap ‘Disaster’ for Conservatives

Newsmax, 11/19/25

https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/newsmax-ruddy-fcc/2025/11/19/id/1235187/

EXCLUSIVE: George Soros Gave $250K to British Group Working To Censor Conservative News Sites and ‘Kill Musk’s Twitter’

The Free Beacon by Chuck Ross, 11/17/25

Https://freebeacon.com/democrats/exclusive-george-soros-gave-250k-to-british-group-working-to-censor-conservative-news-sites-and-kill-musks-twitter/

Scalia Legal Scholar: FCC Has ‘No Authority’ to Lift TV Ownership Cap

Newsmax, 11/17/25

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/fcc-brendan-carr-tv/2025/11/17/id/1234953/

Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger Calls for Action Against Encyclopedia’s Outrageous Policies

MRC Free Speech, Tom Olohan, 11/17/25

https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/tom-olohan/2025/11/18/wikipedia-co-founder-larry-sanger-calls-action-against

 

November 2025 Newsletter

NewsGuard & Censorship Update

November 2025 Report

Inside This Edition:

  • Senate Hearing Exposes Government Pressure on Big Tech to Censor Media
  • Senate Blocks Biased Media Monitors in 2026 National Defense Authorization Act
  • Wikipedia in the Spotlight for Bias and Ties to NewsGuard
  • Report: Microsoft Misled Sen. Cruz; Promotes NewsGuard Through Search Coach
  • IMC Refreshes its Website, Making it a One-Stop-Shop for Media Censorship Info
  • NewsGuard & Censorship Media Roundup

OVERVIEW

The fight to expose government-backed censorship gained fresh momentum this month. The U.S. Senate Commerce Committee’s latest hearing, “Shut Your App: How Uncle Sam Jawboned Big Tech into Silencing Americans,” pulled back the curtain on how federal agencies worked hand in glove with major tech companies to suppress lawful speech, especially that of conservative media. Testimony from witnesses couldn’t have been clearer: government officials leaned on private firms to do what the Constitution forbids them to do directly.

At the same time, the Senate advanced a provision in the FY 2026 National Defense Authorization Act to block the Pentagon from contracting with firms that rely on politically biased media monitors. The measure includes an enforcement mechanism to ensure compliance, a reform the IMC has long championed. And new reports revealed how major platforms, from Wikipedia to Microsoft, continue to support biased monitors like NewsGuard, embedding ideological bias into classrooms, search tools, and digital reference platforms.

The IMC is also pleased to share that it has refreshed its website, Imcamerica.com, so that you can find relevant news and resources to assist you in the fight for free speech and a free press. Read about that and more in this issue of the IMC’s NewsGuard and Censorship Update.

GOVERNMENT

Senate Hearing Exposes Government Pressure on Big Tech to Censor Media

The Senate Commerce Committee held a held a hearing examining evidence that federal agencies coordinated with major technology companies to suppress lawful speech. Throughout “Shut Your App: How Uncle Sam Jawboned Big Tech into Silencing Americans,” lawmakers probed how “jawboning”—the practice of government officials informally pressuring private firms—led to widespread censorship of political viewpoints, particularly from conservative outlets. The hearing featured testimony from journalists, policy experts, and media executives who detailed how federal influence quietly shaped online discourse under the guise of combating misinformation.

Sean Davis, co-founder and CEO of The Federalist, delivered some of the hearing’s most striking testimony, describing how his publication was directly targeted by federal officials for censorship. Davis testified that a government department called the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and its partners acted as “de facto censors,” flagging content from conservative outlets and coordinating with social media companies to suppress or demonetize it. He warned that this covert collusion between government and Big Tech “posed the greatest threat to free speech in modern history.”

Davis also emphasized that the censorship campaign had real economic consequences, noting that social media platforms’ actions—taken at the government’s behest—cost The Federalist and similar outlets millions in lost traffic and revenue. He argued that the suppression was not about public safety but political control, designed to marginalize dissenting media and entrench establishment narratives. “Our government used private companies to do what it could not legally do itself,” Davis said, adding that such coordination “strikes at the heart of the First Amendment.”

Committee members signaled that additional oversight and legislative action may follow to prevent similar abuses. The hearing underscored growing bipartisan concern over the lack of accountability in federal communications with social media firms and highlighted the need for clear legal barriers to government-driven censorship.

 Senate Blocks Biased Media Monitors in 2026 National Defense Authorization Act

The US Senate passed the FY 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) with a critical provision that prevents the Department of Defense from contracting with advertising firms that rely on biased media monitoring services in military recruiting campaigns.

This year’s NDAA provision, authored by US Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) is even stronger than the one Congress adopted in 2023, as it includes an enforcement mechanism that ensures compliance and prevents workarounds by advertising firms.

The House version of the NDAA includes the same measure. The two Chambers will conference to reconcile their versions of the bill before voting on final passage later this year.

Wikipedia in the Spotlight for Bias and Ties to NewsGuard

Wikipedia has come under renewed scrutiny for political bias and its growing alignment with the censorship industry. A new report from the Foundation for Freedom Online (FFO) adds to existing evidence that the site’s editorial hierarchy increasingly suppresses viewpoints outside of establishment consensus while elevating sources tied to government-funded “disinformation” networks.

According to FFO, this is no accident. Wikipedia’s founder, Jimmy Wales, serves as an advisor to NewsGuard. Their report shows how Wikipedia’s editors routinely cite NewsGuard and similar gatekeeping groups to determine which outlets are deemed “trustworthy,” effectively merging the encyclopedia’s content moderation with the censorship industry’s worldview. As a result, entire perspectives—from skepticism of government COVID policies to criticism of global climate accords—are marginalized or erased under the banner of “misinformation.”

FFO warns that Wikipedia’s entanglement with NewsGuard and other disinformation contractors represents a profound conflict of interest. The group calls for full transparency around Wikipedia’s editorial partnerships and funding influences, noting that “truth cannot be outsourced to government contractors and their media allies.”

Fair Election Fund Report: Microsoft Misled Sen. Cruz, Promotes NewsGuard Through “Search Coach,” and Cooperates with CCP Censorship

A new report by The Fair Election Fund, titled Corporate Influence and Concerns with Election Integrity, puts a spotlight on Microsoft for misleading Sen. Ted Cruz and the U.S. Senate when company representatives claimed that it had ended its relationship with NewsGuard. In reality, Microsoft continues to promote NewsGuard through its “Search Coach” education platform, a tool embedded in Microsoft Teams for Education and marketed to K-12 schools.

Within the platform, students are directed to use NewsGuard as a “reliable” and “objective” fact-checking service—an arrangement the report says effectively institutionalizes NewsGuard’s ideological bias in classroom media-literacy training.

The report further documents Microsoft’s cooperation with the Chinese Communist Party’s censorship apparatus, citing independent analyses that show Bing suppresses search results on politically sensitive topics—including Tiananmen Square, Uyghur persecution, and democracy movements—to comply with Beijing’s speech controls. The Fair Election Fund warns that these practices, developed for China, are seeping into Microsoft’s broader content-moderation framework, “importing censorship norms incompatible with American free-speech principles.”

IMC Refreshes its Website, Making it a One-Stop-Shop for Media Censorship Info

The IMC has updated its website to make it easier for you to find media censorship information. All newsletters and press releases can now be found on the site, as well as membership information. We encourage you to share the site with influencers and policy makers who want to learn more about this issue.

With 2026 coming soon, please consider either renewing your membership or joining. As you know, we’ve made great progress this year to fight against the blacklisting of independent and conservative media. We’ve had tangible wins from Congress to state Capitols, but as the November newsletter shows, we have much more to accomplish.

Visit us at imcamerica.com

MEDIA

Google Lackey Doubles Down on Censorship in Appalling Hearing

MRC by Tom Olohan, 10/29/25

https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/tom-olohan/2025/10/29/watch-google-lackey-doubles-down-censorship-appalling

Microsoft Lied to Sen. Ted Cruz About NewsGuard, Continued Censorship Push

The Dallas Express by David Dunmoyer, 10/26/25

OPINION: Microsoft Lied To Sen. Cruz About NewsGuard, Continued Censorship Push

FCC’s Carr: No Decision Yet on Lifting TV Ownership Limits

Newsmax 10/29/25

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/fcc-brendan-carr-television/2025/10/28/id/1232265/

The Knight Foundation: A $100 Million Censorship Behemoth that Partnered with USAID

Foundation for Freedom Online, 10/22/25

The Knight Foundation: A $100M Censorship Behemoth That Partnered With USAID – Foundation for Freedom Online

Real America’s Voice and the Real Cost of Free Speech

RealClearPolitics by David DeRosiers, 10/19/25

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2025/10/19/real_americas_voice_and_the_real_cost_of_free_speech_153422.html 

Davis: Inside the Government Conspiracy to Shut Down The Federalist for Wrongthink

The Federalist by Sean Davis, 10/8/25

https://thefederalist.com/2025/10/08/davis-inside-the-government-conspiracy-to-shut-down-the-federalist-for-wrongthink/

 

 

 

Join Us

The Independent Media Council (IMC) is a non-profit group of conservative and independent media outlets that stand for free speech and a free press.

Join Now to Stop Press Censorship!